PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PSRW.L vs. ^AW01
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PSRW.L and ^AW01 is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

PSRW.L vs. ^AW01 - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and FTSE All World (^AW01). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
7.06%
7.40%
PSRW.L
^AW01

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PSRW.L:

1.78

^AW01:

1.56

Sortino Ratio

PSRW.L:

2.45

^AW01:

2.10

Omega Ratio

PSRW.L:

1.34

^AW01:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

PSRW.L:

2.69

^AW01:

1.96

Martin Ratio

PSRW.L:

9.35

^AW01:

8.05

Ulcer Index

PSRW.L:

1.86%

^AW01:

1.99%

Daily Std Dev

PSRW.L:

9.77%

^AW01:

10.26%

Max Drawdown

PSRW.L:

-49.62%

^AW01:

-59.48%

Current Drawdown

PSRW.L:

0.00%

^AW01:

-0.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSRW.L achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly higher than ^AW01's 5.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PSRW.L has outperformed ^AW01 with an annualized return of 10.03%, while ^AW01 has yielded a comparatively lower 7.18% annualized return.


PSRW.L

YTD

6.34%

1M

0.94%

6M

10.83%

1Y

17.56%

5Y*

11.10%

10Y*

10.03%

^AW01

YTD

5.18%

1M

3.17%

6M

6.82%

1Y

17.98%

5Y*

8.72%

10Y*

7.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PSRW.L vs. ^AW01 — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSRW.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PSRW.L is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PSRW.L is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PSRW.L is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PSRW.L is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PSRW.L is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PSRW.L is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

^AW01
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^AW01 is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^AW01 is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^AW01 is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^AW01 is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^AW01 is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^AW01 is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PSRW.L vs. ^AW01 - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and FTSE All World (^AW01). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PSRW.L, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.371.56
The chart of Sortino ratio for PSRW.L, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.872.10
The chart of Omega ratio for PSRW.L, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.241.29
The chart of Calmar ratio for PSRW.L, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.131.96
The chart of Martin ratio for PSRW.L, currently valued at 6.92, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.938.05
PSRW.L
^AW01

The current PSRW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the ^AW01 Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSRW.L and ^AW01, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.37
1.56
PSRW.L
^AW01

Drawdowns

PSRW.L vs. ^AW01 - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSRW.L drawdown since its inception was -49.62%, smaller than the maximum ^AW01 drawdown of -59.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRW.L and ^AW01. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.22%
-0.23%
PSRW.L
^AW01

Volatility

PSRW.L vs. ^AW01 - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) is 2.14%, while FTSE All World (^AW01) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that PSRW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^AW01 based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.14%
2.58%
PSRW.L
^AW01
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab